Letter to the Editor regarding The Economist 28 February 2009
Sir - Your article “Round and round it goes” surfaced a troubling bias at your newspaper. The article asserts that, “[in Mumbai] recycling is a profitable persuit for all involved, whereas in San Francisco it costs most residents money.” You justify this assertion by stating that, “Indian rag-pickers require no wages, equipment, or electricity,” and contrast this with the living wage paid to workers in the San Francisco Materials Recovery Facility. It seems you are holding up the Mumbai recycling model as an economic ideal, conveniently omitting the fact that it is based on extreme poverty and the patently non-Western practise of wage slavery. This bias makes me wonder what the early editions of your newspaper had to say about the economic effects of Britain’s Slave Trade Act 1843. I sincerely hope your newspaper did not argue in favor of slavery due to its economic benefits for all involved.
Technorati Tags: edburns
